Suri Cruise Birth Certificate - Is There A Real Baby?
The actual Suri Cruise birth certificate has been found:
“First, St. John’s Hospital has a policy of filing birth certificates within 10 days of birth. In this case, Suri was born on April 18 but the certificate was not filed until May 8, 20 days later. An official from the hospital told TMZ that the delay occurred because they needed a signature from the parents or a representative of the parents certifying birth, and that person did not come in until May 4. The person who signed is labeled “friend.” The signature is not legible.
Also, the “Attendant or Certifier” who signed the certificate — Anne Heffernan, RNC — was not in the delivery room and did not see the baby. But a hospital rep tells TMZ that Heffernan is authorized to sign when the doctor is not available. A hospital rep said “normally the doctor signs” but it isn’t a requirement.
Finally, the hospital rep said that the circumstances that triggered the eventual signing of the birth certificate were that Suri needed a passport and a birth certificate is a prerequisite to obtaining one.” - TMZ
I don’t know if this means there’s an actual real live baby or not. Suri was “supposedly” born in April, and here it is July and no baby sighting, not one. Plus, Katie, sorry, KATE Holmes hasn’t really been seen, and neither has Tom. So there’s a coupla scenarios going on here:
- Tom and Katie are just enjoying their new baby like any couple in love. (Pass the Precious Moments figurines, please.)
- There is no baby and Team Cruisazy is trying to figure out how to play this.
What do you all think? Talk amongst yourselves in the comments.
Tags: Celebrity Babies, Celebrity CouplesRelated Stories
POSTED IN: Celebrity Babies, Celebrity Couples
9 opinions for Suri Cruise Birth Certificate - Is There A Real Baby?
lilian
Jul 13, 2006 at 17:12
This is a weird couple, spears/federline seem so normal next to them.
I hate Tom Cruise for “brainwashing” Katie Holmes, Hurray!! for Nicole Kidman, she got out just in time.
Leave the wackiness to Michael Jackson.
Barbara
Jul 17, 2006 at 11:08
This is the smartest publicity stunt ever! That there is a baby, I don’t doubt. I like a good “dish” as well as the next person, but this guy is turning into a cartoon, just like some of our other “celebrties”. What is there to celebrate about these people? Next thing you know, he’ll be a spokesman for Kool Aid. Careful
First you’re laughing at them,
Next you’re laughing with them,
Then they’re laughing at you.
lilian
Jul 17, 2006 at 17:38
Why hide a baby that is surely cute? Mom is a beauty, dad is not bad, no Brad Pitt, but he OK.
If safety for the child is a concern, Tom should borrow some of Wacko Jacko kids veils.
Angel
Jul 17, 2006 at 19:10
The 1st thing ppl. need to understand about “celebrities” as they’ve been dubbed, is they are all living in a fantasy world to get paid ridiculous sums of money. Why does anyone bother with them? So Kate & Thomas Cruise had a baby…Hello, is this the first couple to do this?
I say stop making such a big deal of it(which is exactly what they’re hoping everyone will do)& sooner or later their dirty laundry will be found out, or they’ll just fade into the wallpaper…which is where most of these kooks belong.
kaiserin amanda
Jul 23, 2006 at 23:13
Poor Katie Holmes, she looks so ugly since she hooked up with that nutcase Tom. She used to be so beautiful, now she just looks washed out, fat, and brainwashed. If I was her, I’d leave that kid with Tom and escape. I bet he’d pay her off big time to keep her from talking, and she wouldn’t have to deal with a kid, she could just get back to her career and forget that this whole unfortunate “episode” even occurred. I personally don’t care if there is a kid or not, I don’t particularly LIKE children in the first place, especially children that will grow up to be spoiled, useless, and selfish. We don’t need any more Parasite “Herpes” Hiltons running around, so it would probably be better if this kid was a publicity stunt. If it IS real, it will never have a normal life, it will be brainwashed by those lame Scientologists and won’t be able to think for itself or get any real help for it’s problems, they’ll just hook it up to the soup cans and “audit” all the problems away….yeah right. This poor thing is going to be SERIOUSLY screwed up, and we already have enough neurotic, annoying, brainwashed religious wackos who feel they need to tell everybody else how to live their lives, in this world…they’re called “Christians”, to name the biggest group. We definitley don’t need any more, besides, this planet is already WAAAY too overpopulated, and having kids is overrated. I read that 40% of people regret having their kids….those aren’t good odds. But if you’re rich like Tom, you can just dump it off on a nanny and basically ignore it. This kid (if it exists) is just another way for loony Tom to feed his enormous, Napoleonic ego. Poor kid will never be valued for who it is, it would really be better off to not have been born at all.
Terry
Jul 24, 2006 at 12:11
Have we all forgotten, in the beginning Katie told us that she had a crush on Tom when she was a little girl, and that she always dreamed she would marry him….Ok…Katie, I bet the dream has turned to a nightmare now! Leave the fake and take they “baby” with you…millions of us have done it, you can to.
Axis
Jul 24, 2006 at 13:59
Leave the poor couple alone. Nobody has forced either of them into a relationship and with the added weight of the world watching and people like you commenting on brainwashing and practical stunt children I am surprised they are getting along as well as they are. The only truths here are they are together and plan to stay that way, child and all. Whatever happens, happens as with all people.
Abi
Jul 27, 2006 at 07:32
I’m reading all about the ‘fake’ TomKat baby over here in England with much mirth. They’ve published a story about the possibility that there is no Suri in one of our national newspapers today alongside a photo of Katie taken just before she ‘gave birth’. The bump looks ridiculously fake, it’s bloody huge but just doesn’t look right. I wouldn’t put anything past Cruise, not after seeing footage of his God-awful ‘I’m so in love’ sofa jumping exploits on Oprah. The man just turns my stomach.
Chinese_Orchid
Dec 28, 2006 at 06:58
i wanna no how tom brainwashed her this is a jk she woz so gr8 all da guys i no luved her all da gurls i no wanted to b in her postion now its urgh she gone so ugly n hasnt got a mind of her own n urgh toms a perve…also y the hell lie about a baby if u dont av 1 den u dont the longer this goes on the more harder it will b for them n wots this bout her havin another babi do u fink shes actually avin 1 dis tym n if she is do u fink they’ll show this 1 sayin its suri n say da otha 1 woz a miscarriage….tom is sick ebuff to do this n coz hes fucked wit kates mind she mytr go along wit it….god she needs a new guy n tom needs a new hobby
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: