Angelina Jolie: Actress or publicity machine?

July 28, 2007 by Wendy Boswell  

brad_angelina_3.png

Honestly? I don’t agree with this article at all. I think that while Angelina Jolie’s life when put all together look pretty nutty, she’s still pretty awesome. And she does a lot of good in this world.

IF anybody has forgotten how much wild living Angelina Jolie has packed into her 32 years, it’s conveniently tallied up like a kinky scorecard in a new book that sizes her up as having more talent as a publicity machine than an actress.

The pouty-lipped Oscar winner is “the modern Lana Turner because her filmography is not really the source of her fame . . . Despite winning the Best Supporting Actress Oscar in 2000 for ‘Girl, Interrupted,’ Jolie has an overall filmography that is less than stellar,” screen historian Jeanine Basinger writes in “The Star Machine.” Basinger singles out such Jolie turkeys as “Taking Lives,” “Beyond Borders,” “Life or Something Like It” and “Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.”

“Fans don’t need to watch her films . . . Her roles are only pale imitations of her off-screen self,” continues Basinger, a professor at Wesleyan College. She then recites the sordid highlights of Jolie’s life:
“[She twice] married and divorced very young; publicly kissed her brother a little too hard; admitted to cutting herself; made vague references to drugs; dated a woman; expressed a yearning to be ‘taken down’ by a suitably dominant individual of either gender; declared a willingness to try bondage; wore a vial of second husband [Billy Bob] Thornton’s blood (and divorced him amid allegations of his insatiable sex addiction);” and “announced that she satisfies her post-divorce sexual needs by having flings with men in motels.”
She also, the book recounts, “adopted a boy from Cambodia, a boy from Vietnam, and a girl from Ethiopia; allegedly delivered the death blow to Brad Pitt’s staggering marriage to Jennifer Aniston; conceived Pitt’s child; [has] given birth; and in the middle of all this, found time to take a genuine and serious mission to the United Nations on behalf of the world’s children.”
Basinger says Jolie, back in the days of the Hollywood star system, “could have found steady work playing larger-than-life, even terrifying female characters. Today, she has become one herself . . . It is not a cultural accident that Jolie’s one serious, Oscar-winning role was that of a mental patient.”
Jolie’s manager, Guyer Kosinski, did not answer a detailed e-mail.

And why should he? This is a stupidly reasoned out article.

source

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MySpace
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Comments

One Response to “Angelina Jolie: Actress or publicity machine?”
  1. fan says:

    i don t agree with the article and i like her.
    yes she has a wild past but today she s one of most amazing person out there.she s a fab actress,one of best of her generation alongside cate b. reese,kate winslet

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme


All content is Copyright © 2005-2010 b5media. All rights reserved.