Is Reese Witherspoon pregnant with Jake Gyllenhaal’s baby?
May 7, 2008 by Wendy Boswell
Okay, look at this picture of Reese at some breast cancer thingamajig and tell me what you think:
I think she just ate an extra waffle at breakfast and is a little bloaty. What do you think?
via splashnewsonline.com
Just good friends, I think he is likely gay. Maybe friends with benefits, I have no idea nor interest. Both seem to be nice decent people, maybe both a little too much with the foo-foo food restaurants and too west coast leftist. Oh well, they have the money to do what they want. Anti-war and gay dumb movies are pretty much always money losers. They should each look to do a new classic movie even if a remake of the golden age 1930’s - 1940’s. Something patriotic. That is what America wants. Middle America apple pie values. No anti-war crap like Rendition.
I think she might be a little bloaty, maybe a little menstrual fun mixed in with some carb loading.
I say yes that she is pregnant. First thing you should notice is that she has her hands on her back which basically means when you’re pregnant, it feels like my back is broken. Secondly, if she weren’t pregnant, she’d be wearing a bigger top trying to cover up fat. You show off a baby bump but cover up flab. She still looks amazing. She’d look amazing even if she was putting on a few extra pounds!
Jake - gay? Come’on, get a clue and look beyond the Brokeback mountain thing. Yeah, they are in love, and perhaps maybe there is something growing in there — wouldn’t that be great?!
Would you all just give up on the gay thing? Jake is NOT gay, none of you thought he was gay before Brokeback Mountain, because he wasn’t and still isn’t gay. He just played a gay role in a movie once, thats all, so get over it.
I did see Reese recently on TV with a very loose black top. Hmmm. I would consider having Jake’s baby to be close to a religious experience, and if she’s lucky enough to be doing it, God bless her!